Ecofacism

Patrick Crusius loved nature, criticized systems of capitalism and urban sprawl, and wrote an environmental manifesto titled, “An Inconvenient Truth.” His “solution” for climate change was racial genocide. Exactly one year ago, he massacred 23 people in the 2019 El Paso shooting.

August 03, 2020

The 2019 El Paso shooting

In his manifesto, Crusius states that his attack is “a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas.”1 Along with the convenient lack of police brutality2, this particular massacre also highlights a particularly dangerous strain of white environmentalism: ecofascism.

Fascism, but make it green. 🌱

Ecofascism combines ideologies of nationalism, white environmentalism, and white supremacy. White environmentalism intentionally erases and silences BIPOC activists’ voices and refuses to acknowledge that it is the systems of white supremacy that led to our current-day climate crisis. Ecofascists take these ideologies to the extreme3, often calling for the explicit genocide of people they deem “other.” This is also why taking a solutionist approach to solving climate change is so dangerous—fixating on “solutions” without understanding the historical and social contexts and consequences mean that ideas like genocide start to become valid.

While ecofascist ideas tend to be more fringe, environmentalists (particularly white, privileged environmentalists) need to consider how they will respond as the climate crisis worsens.4 Will they start listening to the concerns and demands of BIPOC environmentalists who have been calling out these red flags for decades, or will they continue to legitimize eco-fascist viewpoints by claiming they need to “value both sides?”

References